<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Water Acropora, part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fragd.it/2009/10/14/deep-water-acropora-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fragd.it/2009/10/14/deep-water-acropora-part-1/</link>
	<description>Reefs, coral, fish and aquariums.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Adams</title>
		<link>http://blog.fragd.it/2009/10/14/deep-water-acropora-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fragd.it/?p=2279#comment-3397</guid>
		<description>First Acropora pictured is A. lokani, caroliniana has much much shorter branching nodes. And your A. lokani is incorrect. I don&#039;t know what species it is but it comes in as a Bali aquaculture and it most closely resembles a thin branching A. loripes. I had a big deepwater acropora section in my old Acro tank, you can really see the distinction when you are growing several specimens of each species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Acropora pictured is A. lokani, caroliniana has much much shorter branching nodes. And your A. lokani is incorrect. I don&#8217;t know what species it is but it comes in as a Bali aquaculture and it most closely resembles a thin branching A. loripes. I had a big deepwater acropora section in my old Acro tank, you can really see the distinction when you are growing several specimens of each species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlad</title>
		<link>http://blog.fragd.it/2009/10/14/deep-water-acropora-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fragd.it/?p=2279#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>All of them are. A.lokani can be found in the deeper areas in the ocean, but is normally seen in shallower reefs. It is the only species on that list that I wanted to use, that can be also a shallow water coral. There is no perpetuating. Look them up for yourself. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of them are. A.lokani can be found in the deeper areas in the ocean, but is normally seen in shallower reefs. It is the only species on that list that I wanted to use, that can be also a shallow water coral. There is no perpetuating. Look them up for yourself. <img src='http://blog.fragd.it/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrimpchips</title>
		<link>http://blog.fragd.it/2009/10/14/deep-water-acropora-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrimpchips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fragd.it/?p=2279#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>Not all of these are deep water per se, no?  AIMS lists A. lokani as a shallow water species.  

Morphologically these corals appear similar, but I don&#039;t think you should perpetuate their rough grouping together as &quot;deepwater&quot; based purely on morphological similarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all of these are deep water per se, no?  AIMS lists A. lokani as a shallow water species.  </p>
<p>Morphologically these corals appear similar, but I don&#8217;t think you should perpetuate their rough grouping together as &#8220;deepwater&#8221; based purely on morphological similarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

